> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 05:01:02PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > (well, ports_manage_multithreaded is still necessary, as Mach > > > > doesn't let you receive messages in the order they were sent easily) > > > > I'm not sure what Marcus means here. Messages are dequeued from a > > particular port in the order they were sent (if sending was serialized). > > You can receive on a particular port (or on a portset containing no other > > ports) and you will get them in order. > > Oh, that... mmh. That means I should use > ports_manage_port_operations_one_thread, instead multithread ;)
You can make a special bucket for the port and use ..._one_thread in its own thread, yes. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
