[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Möller) writes: > Could be. I think it would make sense to start by outlining the > filesystem interface (rpc:s for listing old versions/deleted files, > opening or recovering an older version (probably, linking it to a new > name should be an optional part of the process?), hard deletion (which > should not just unlink the file but also overwrite the appropriate > bits on the underlying store) etc.
At this point, it seems like the filesystem already supports everything we need, but we need a set of conventions about how to use it, so that programs like rm don't actually issue dir_unlink calls, but do something more clever. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
