Hi,
can something take a look at this? This requires investigation of the specs file, and
testing the profile flags if they work.
Background on this is in the gcc bug database.
Thanks,
Marcus
----- Forwarded message from dhazeghi at yahoo dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: "dhazeghi at yahoo dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bug target/5212] [Hurd] profiling support for i386-gnu specs file
X-Bugzilla-Reason: Reporter
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_30,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES
version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|dhazeghi at yahoo dot com |
------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-07-18 14:43 -------
Hello,
just a reminder that this bug is WAITING for feedback. Does gcc 3.3 have profiling
support for
HURD?
Dara
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
