On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:38:50AM +0100, Patrick Leslie Polzer wrote: > Hello list,
Hi, > please excuse my ignorance, but what's the Status of GNU Mach? GNU Mach is currently the only microkernel which is supported by the Hurd. That is: If you want to run Hurd, you need Mach. That may change, but so far it hasn't. > I heard the L4 microkernel is favored for the Hurd. Do you guys try to catch > up? There are some problems with Mach which seem very hard or even impossible to fix without using a new microkernel. For that reason, we are looking at other microkernels. We were planning to use L4, but it seems it will be something else (either a successor of L4, or Coyotos, yet another microkernel). For more information and discussion on this, see the l4-hurd list and its archives. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
