> Is there some kind of logic to how you split up the ChangeLog > entries?
What exactly don't you understand about it? I'm asking if there is logic to the split up, if there isn't, each change should be in a seperate ChangeLog entry. If there is, please explain such logic. > How did you check that the files are ok to remove (it is a long > list, so it is hard to check each file)? I checked it by verifying against GNU Mach's build system. How? > i386/utils/debug.h looks a suspicious for example. Why? Because it is used from what I can see. If you do not know why you are removing a file, don't remove it. > I'm not sure what `adopt all users' means. Maybe you mean > callees? I mean all places where the macro is used; `NHD' was defined in i386/bogus/hd.h to zero, now I adopted all the places where `NHD' was used in the code to the case of it being defined to zero. I'm open to hear suggestions for better wording, of course, but I'm not yet convinced that ``callees'' is more appropriate. `Updated all references.'. Please read the GNU Coding Standards, they have all of this, including older ChangeLog entries. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
