On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:39 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: > Hi again folks, > > OK, I am confused by something else. (I know big surprise :-) ). > > i386/i386/spl.h > #include ipl.h > > i386/i386/ipl.h > #ifdef __ASSEMBLER__ > #include <i386/machspl.h> > ... > > i386/i386/machspl.h > /* XXX replaced by... */ > #include <i386/spl.h> > > First question is, is this an issue? machspl.h doesn't seem to have any > #ifdef _I386_MACHSPL_H_ wrapper around it. > > Second question, is: Should machspl.h just be dropped and replace all > instances with spl.h?
Perhaps the reason for having the different files is to accommodate device drivers that were written for different kernels? Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
