Hello! On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:21:14PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > BTW, why is the CVS holding generated files like configure & co? Since > we all have variouns versios of autoconf/automake, the cvs diff output > is cluttered with useless hooks.
Correct. I followed that practice of the previous committers to the trees. It has both advantages and disadvantages. You listed a disadvantage. An advantage is that we can easily tell people: ``Get the `gnumach-1-branch' from cvs and compile that one.'' without having to worry if they have suitable versions of the Auto* tools installed. I don't know if that is really a strong argument, though. I don't have a general objection against changing that practice. What are others's opinions? Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
