On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:50:52PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Okay, a new zalloc zone would be overkill, but I've implemented a tiny > new kernel object, lumped it all together -- and it even works, it seems! > > But then noticed that I had forgotten to deallocate the kernel object's > `kalloc'ed memory, added such a deallocation as well -- and now get a > kernel page fault after having `kfree'ed that memory in a ``no senders'' > service routine. If I leave away the `kfree' then everything is fine, > save the memory leak, of course. Hmm. > > Is there any Mach savvy person who feels like helping poor tschwinge?
I can spend some time on this with you :-). -- Richard Braun
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
