On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 14:52 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > I had emailed Thomas in regards to this because I didn't want to start > a general panic over the license. Anyway, we have a few problems in > any regard (I'm a Savannah Administrator, and if we have to remove the > GPL later clause, then we're in violation of Savannah's hosting > policy)
Once more, I seem to have taken your word for it when I shouldn't have. The link you provided, to https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/GnuGplTwoOrLater, certainly does request people to use the "or any later version" clause. Well and good. Nothing there, however, says that projects *must* use it as a condition of being hosted on Savannah. I do hope you are not using your position to attempt to strongarm people into following rules that do not actually exist. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
