"JLAS" == Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Could you try with the attached patch instead of my previous patch?
>> Note: this patch is what Linux always does.
[...]
>> template |= INTEL_PTE_WRITE;
>> + if (machine_slot[cpu_number()].cpu_type >= CPU_TYPE_I486
>> + && pa >= phys_last_addr)
>> + template |= INTEL_PTE_NCACHE|INTEL_PTE_WTHRU;
>> if (wired)
NB: the original message has TABs (^I, ASCII 9) here. Like the
file you're trying to patch, I guess.
[...]
JLAS> Can't understand why:
> /usr/src/gnumach# patch -p0 < patch_04.patch
> patching file i386/intel/pmap.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1506.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 1618.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file i386/intel/pmap.c.rej
> /usr/src/gnumach#
[...]
> template |= INTEL_PTE_WRITE;
> + if (machine_slot[cpu_number()].cpu_type >= CPU_TYPE_I486
> + && pa >= phys_last_addr)
> + template |= INTEL_PTE_NCACHE|INTEL_PTE_WTHRU;
> if (wired)
... While here are the spaces (ASCII 32).
[...]
JLAS> Can you see the "problem"?.
Looks like ``TABs vs. spaces'' problem. How did you put the
attachment's contents into `patch_04.patch'? Might it be that
TABs were expanded to spaces? You should try to avoid the
expansion, or you may use the `--ignore-whitespace' option to
`patch'.
_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
