Hi, On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 07:47:04PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> The point is: The Hurd doesn't need a powerful source control tool, it > just needs something which is much better than CVS and usable by all > possible contributors. > > Once the Hurd has reached 1/100 of the RCS traffic of Linux, a switch > to a powerful tool might be feasable. That's like saying that it's only useful to run GNU/Linux on very large servers, because others don't need the power... There is probably a difference between a project with a single contributor, and a project with more than one. But otherwise, the size or activity of a project has very little influence on what kind of things the developers need or want to do regarding version control. -antrik-
