Hello! On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:05:52PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > Olaf said some of the things I was thinking.
When replying there, I hope to have addressed your concerns as well. > In short, I think this plan is too clever by half. Thanks ;-). Indeed I spent some time on this issue, before I sent out my email. > Repository conversion is repository conversion. Agreed. > It's not an opportunity to rejigger the history. Well. If we nevertheless have a service interruption (not that it'd matter...), why not -- again: *before* doing the actual conversion -- fix up some things as well? And, in fact, I had already suggested this split-up like two years ago. > It's a fundamental failure of what the repository is > there for if it loses or divides the history. See my other email. > There is no problem with the size of the history. Likewise, see my other email. Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature