Hi, On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Now, for publishing last years' GSoC projects etc., we'd need another > bunch of 'em: for the projects that create new ``modules'' (procfs, > LISP stuff, libchannel, eth-filter, eth-multiplexer, proc_proxy, > nsmux, ...) -- I'd like to have theses in separate repositories > instead of muddling all of them into the Hurd proper repository. Why? Who exactly would would benefit from that? > But instead of creating a full-fledged (separate) Git repository for > each of the projects, I propose to have a ``dump'' repository in which > there are several independent branches (`lisp', `channel', `eth-*', > ...) containing the respective files. Sounds like a mess. What is the advantage over branches in the main repository? Ideally, users should be able to create their own repositories, like on freedesktop.org. I don't think Savannah supports that though?... :-( -antrik-
