Hi, On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:46:17PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:11:47AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:17:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > The best situation would be if the file handle could be easily > > > avoided, on which matter I cannot comment right away without a deeper > > > investigation of nfsd. I think that avoiding file handles is worth > > > the effort, but then I remember your words about a second level of > > > directory structure to support NFS, which means that the effort might > > > be pointless due to the fact that a file-handle-like structure is > > > inherently necessary. > > > > Indeed, I don't think it's likely that it can be avoided -- or otherwise > > it wouldn't have been added in the first place... > > Maybe I should try to mail somebody who is more involved with nfsd > matters than we are (like Thomas Bushnell)? You sure can try... -antrik-
