Hi, On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:24:41AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2009 21:32:51 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
> > * help-hurd: mostly unused, shut down. Forward to bug-hurd. > > Rationale: people seeking help about using the Hurd end up on the > > debian-hurd mailing list in the vast majority of cases, all others > > can be served on bug-hurd (they are to be CCed when answering, so > > they need not even be subscribed). > > This is a separation I'd keep, though. If we manage to get the Hurd > users more active again, there will likely be a need for that list > again. Won't work -- never did, never does, never will. More than half of the posts on help-hurd should actually go to bug-hurd; and more than half of the posts that should go to help-hurd, go to bug-hurd... Other projects with separate lists get simiar experience: it only increases management overhead, causes fragmentation, confusion, and redundancy. And we can always think about splitting them up again, when the traffic really becomes a problem... -antrik-