Hello, On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 07:12:54AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 03:32:52PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > As far as I can remember, nsmux keeps the control ports of the started > > translators, which, as I understand it, won't let them go away because > > of absence of clients. > > Nope. There is *always* someone who has the control port of a translator > -- otherwise, no client could ever connect... The control ports do not > prevent a translator from going away (where would the fsys_goaway() > request be sent to if there was no control port open?...); only protid > ports do.
Aha, good to hear. This means that, unless nsmux opens bogus ports (which I don't remember), the anonymous translators will actually go away after the timeout with the current design. Thanks for the explanation! :-) Best regards, Sergiu
