Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 10:32:26 +0100, a écrit : > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 09:53 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 08:39:39 +0100, a écrit : > > > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 00:31 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 00:18:16 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > > > > > I don't understand what you mean. What delay are you talking about? > > > > > > The only delay in by branch is the delay requested by the user. > > > > > > > > > > Well, with my code I need a timeout of 1ms for poll, with the old > > > > > code I > > > > > don't. > > > > > > > > That 1ms is completely got ridden of by Richard's changes. I don't > > > > understand what problem you are still seeing. > > > > > > I know that Richards changes solve the problem by moving the timeouts to > > > the server. > > > > Ok, so there is actually no problem. > > The only issue would be that the changes will not be available in > 2.13-39+ (wheezy) but 2.17+ (wheezy+1), right?
It's trivially portable (and will be) on 2.13 Samuel
