Hi. 在 2013-5-10,18:35,Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> 写道:
> Hi! > > In the last days, I've been and still am rather busy with other > commitments, and unfortunately have not yet been able to continue working > with you on your GSoC application as well as the GDB patch you sent. > Starting Tuesday next week, I should be able to spend more time on that. Ok,I will waiting for your review on that application. > > On Thu, 2 May 2013 20:50:03 +0800, 陆岳 <hacklu.newb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> >> wrote: >> >>> You can clone hurd/web.git repository from Savannah, and check out the >>> toolchain/logs/master branch (which I have as a Git submodule on >>> toolchain/logs), and compare the >>> gdb/coulomb.SCHWINGE/test/gdb/testsuite/gdb.*/*.sum files with those you >>> got. >> >> I will do the compare after I have finished the application. > > Yes, please have a look at that. For example, do you get significantly > different test failures than I have, and how/why are they different? > Please be aware that the results from the GDB testsuite, especially when > run on GNU Hurd, are not completely "stable" (deterministic): as you can > see from the revisions of my test result files, some FAILs come and go > randomly, not related to any GDB code changes, or system environment > changes. That is, for two GDB test runs you'll get some different > results. (With time, you'll get used to quickly recognize and "ignore" > these...) ;-| Ah, I got it. > > Oh, and if you want to read more about GDB's architecture and provenance, > I can recommend Stan Shebs' chapter in »The Architecture of Open Source > Applications«, <http://www.aosabook.org/en/gdb.html>. That's just what I need. I am reading the <gdb internals> these days. > > Grüße, > Thomas Yue Lu (陆岳)