Marin Ramesa, le Sun 08 Dec 2013 12:40:26 +0100, a écrit : > This wasn't noticed before since the number of cpus is always one I guess, but > cpu_interrupt_to_db() is without definition. Comment the call.
Well, I prefer the issue to be noticed at compilation and thus spotted immediately rather than by the stuff not working correctly, and the poor hacker wondering why not... > * ddb/db_mp.c (cpu_interrupt_to_db): Comment the call. > > --- > ddb/db_mp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/ddb/db_mp.c b/ddb/db_mp.c > index b99718e..1b1277e 100644 > --- a/ddb/db_mp.c > +++ b/ddb/db_mp.c > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ remote_db() { > machine_slot[i].is_cpu && > machine_slot[i].running) > { > - cpu_interrupt_to_db(i); > + /*cpu_interrupt_to_db(i);*/ > } > } > } > -- > 1.8.1.4 > > -- Samuel <P> je sens venir la fonte 14 pour le rapport -+- #ens-mim -+-