On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>wrote: > > Again, no. Drivers can work the way they prefer. The driver > infrastructure itself doesn't need a "bigplan", it is parts of it which > need their own. For instance, the IRQ issue I mentioned has its plan > by itself, and it doesn't need to interfere with the physical memory > allocation issue.
That's not sure, unless we have a plenty of driver works, we may need adjust the infrastructure for the need or some new abstract . Although we have driver infrastructure, no enough third part driver provider now. The audio driver and video driver may be part of hurd at first ( just on repo's view), at least some high level abstract, this need a plan. Cong Zhang
