On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi! > > "Welcome back!" ;-) > > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 22:40:13 +0800, Yue Lu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Thomas Schwinge < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > GDB: »catch syscall«; pretty-printing of mach_msg. > > > <https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/open_issues/gdb_catch_syscall.html > >, > > > <https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Set-Catchpoints.html>. > That > > > translates to us to »break mach_msg« with suitable RPC name matching. > > > Pretty printing of mach_msg arguments à la rpctrace. Might these days > be > > > implemented as a Python pretty-printer in GDB. > > > > > > > I have some interesting with this ideal. > > Also, your gdbserver work still needs to be integrated upstream, so that > is another thing to work on. I am very interesting in that will the gdb server be a workaround for hurd gdb's "warning: Can't wait for pid ???: No child processes" problem? Can anyone has workable gdb server to do a test? Can't continue really make me crazy and not so convenience. Thanks, Cong Zhang
