On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:31:01AM -0300, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote:
> This way we don't have to make the settlement of wonders about "the
> (elegant and powerful) true Hurdish way" become a dependency of the
> actual hardware support the Hurd community needs so badly.
> 
> What are your thoughts on that?

I'm completely opposed to this approach. The Hurd has no other purpose
than showing what its elegant and powerful way can provide. I for one
really don't care about getting a user base, unless that user base
exists precisely because of the features of the system.

-- 
Richard Braun

Reply via email to