On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:31:01AM -0300, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote: > This way we don't have to make the settlement of wonders about "the > (elegant and powerful) true Hurdish way" become a dependency of the > actual hardware support the Hurd community needs so badly. > > What are your thoughts on that?
I'm completely opposed to this approach. The Hurd has no other purpose than showing what its elegant and powerful way can provide. I for one really don't care about getting a user base, unless that user base exists precisely because of the features of the system. -- Richard Braun