Svante Signell, on Tue 30 Aug 2016 23:38:19 +0200, wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 23:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, on Tue 30 Aug 2016 17:40:00 +0200, wrote: > > > > > > Attached is an updated patch returning also EINVAL if abs(delta) is too > > > large. > > Never mix changes, please. > > > > > > > > Whether the adjtime()/RPC_host_adjust_time.c:___host_adjust_time() > > > survives > > > a > > > delta being NULL remains to test. > > Well, there is no need to test::) > > > > *(time_value_t *) delta, > > > > will just crash. > > How probable is this kind of (misuse) of this function?
? It's not misuse, it's even documented in the manual. > Nevertheless, maybe we could use another dummy struct timespec (or the > one already available)? No. Please think about what values you would put in the dummy struct, and what consequence they will have. Samuel
