On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 23:24 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 13:19:52 +0100, a ecrit:
> > Svante Signell, le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 12:11:25 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > However, all these tests are still failing, but now mainly with SIGABRT or
> > > "signal 20 (SIGCHLD) received but handler not on signal stack" or "signal
> > > 30
> > > (SIGUSR1) received but handler not on signal stack".
> > >
> > > So I think there are still more bugs to hunt down.
> >
> > Yep, but there is most probably some progress here, and possibly it'll
> > be easier to track down such explicit abort than a SIGILL from out of
> > space.
>
> I guess this is printed from ./src/libgo/runtime/go-signal.c? It'd be
> useful to dump the content of st and print sp.
(gdb) p sp
$1 = 654468
(gdb) p st
$2 = {ss_sp = 0x0, ss_size = 0, ss_flags = 0}
