On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 00:37 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on Fri 08 Jan 2016 21:59:56 +0100, wrote: > > > Yes. And SO_REUSEADDR won't help there :) > > > > Samuel, this is exactly what the SO_REUSEADDR in pflocal should do: > > Except no Unix makes it do that.
Well, it works for GNU/Linux. > > Unlink the old socket and create a new one with the same name. (I > > wonder how GNU/Linux is implementing this?) > > It doesn't. How is it implemented then? I need to find a good testcase for this.
