> Every year or couple of year has its own marketting trend, and if you > don't follow it each time (thus consuming your time just for that), In fact, It's not necessary to follow the hype about a technology or a trend. But It's not necessary to follow the hype to create a beautiful webpage. The current page is many 90s style. The FSF webpage (https://www.fsf.org/) is more beautiful than the current Hurd webpage, for example. The GNU project's main website ( https://www.gnu.org/) is a good example too.
So, It's possible to make a beautiful and useful webpage, without following the latest trends and hype. El jue., 20 ago. 2020 a las 0:20, Samuel Thibault (<samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>) escribió: > Almudena Garcia, le jeu. 20 août 2020 00:03:08 +0200, a ecrit: > > > But deciding to have a look at some project only because the website > is all > > > shiny, no. > > It is more important than you're thinking now. > > AGAIN I'm saying it's not "important". What I'm saying is that I don't > understand the *reasoning* behind people actually thinking that an > all-shiny website truly means a technically sound project. > > Yes, the website probably needs some reorganization so that newcomers > find the information they need more easily etc. I'm not talking about > this. > > I'm talking about the flurry of cosmetic *trends* I see on all websites. > Every year or couple of year has its own marketting trend, and if you > don't follow it each time (thus consuming your time just for that), > you'd be considered "old" and "ugly". It's that haste, completely > unrelated to the actual content of the website that I just don't > understand from people with a more evolved brain than monkeys have. > > Samuel >
