On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 10:02 AM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>
wrote:
> Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 12 févr. 2023 14:10:38 +0300, a ecrit:
> > Since GNU Mach commit d30481122a5d24ad6b921062f93b9172ef922fc3,
> > i386/machine_types.defs defines types based on defined(__x86_64__).
> > Supressing the built-in macro definitions will now result in the wrong
> > type being silently selected.
> >
> > -undef was initially introduced in commit
> > 78b6a7665db7b2eae367e17102821cbdca231d19 without much of an explanation.
> > -ansi was introduced in commit 6940fb91859e46b2e96a331a029f2dc2a0ee51c9
> > "to avoid -Di386=1 and the like".
> >
> > Since glibc has been using MIG with CPP set to a custom GCC invocation
> > which did *not* use either flag, it appears that everything works well
> > enough even without them. On the other hand, not having __x86_64__
> > defined most definetely causes issues for anything that does not set a
> > custom CPP when invoking MIG (i.e., most users). Other built-in
> > definitions could be used in the future in a similar way (e.g. on other
> > architectures); it's really more of a coincidence that they have not
> > been used until now, and things kept working with -undef.
>
> That looks alright to me. Flavior, what do you think about it?
>
Seems fine to me.
>
> > ---
> > mig.in | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mig.in b/mig.in
> > index 63e0269..94fd500 100644
> > --- a/mig.in
> > +++ b/mig.in
> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ migcom=${MIGDIR-$libexecdir}/${MIGCOM-@MIGCOM@}
> > # The expansion of TARGET_CC might refer to ${CC}, so make sure it is
> defined.
> > default_cc="@CC@"
> > CC="${CC-${default_cc}}"
> > -default_cpp="@TARGET_CC@ -E -x c -undef -ansi"
> > +default_cpp="@TARGET_CC@ -E -x c"
> > cpp="${CPP-${default_cpp}}"
> >
> > cppflags=
> > --
> > 2.39.1
>
