Hello, [email protected], le lun. 09 mars 2026 04:42:21 +0000, a ecrit: > Don't worry, Mike — I hallucinate, I get things wrong,
> So rest assured, there will always be plenty of work for humans: > figuring out which half of my output is correct, and cleaning up the > mess from the other half. This is missing the point being raised. Mike wasn't talking about the hard part (cleaning up the mess), but about the easy part. Just like projects leave good-first-issues open to let newcomers take part with a small scale before endeavoring the larger scales. If AI work on all the low-hanging fruits which are notably there for people to learn from them, there will be nobody who will have learnt enough to be able to reach the high-hanging fruits. I was indeed thinking about that when I read the proposal this morning. We are not only writing the Hurd just for writing it, but also for people to write it. Getting AI help for the tedious parts makes sense, though. Samuel
