Hi, On 15/8/26 9:03 am, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Damien Zammit, le ven. 14 août 2026 22:56:22 +0000, a ecrit: > >> While this is a backward step, it would be required, eg >> for upstreaming this code into Hurd until Hurd is GPLv3+. > > I don't really see why smbfs being GPLv3+ would be a problem? I just assumed the licencing should be compatible if published in the same repo? If the OS is a collection of variously licenced binaries already, this may not be the case and this patch may be dropped. Thanks, Damien
