Damien Zammit, le sam. 22 août 2026 22:48:46 +0000, a ecrit: > On 22/8/26 7:24 am, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Damien Zammit, le ven. 21 août 2026 08:44:24 +0000, a ecrit: > >> I am getting mach_msg_trap after mach_msg is sent and then a hang, if > >> you look at thread 11 in the previous backtrace. > > But the question is: what was supposed to interrupt your timed block? Is > > the condition of wake-up valid or not? Is the timeout value meaningful? > > Assuming mach_msg_trap is from a SIGTRAP?
No, it just means that on enters mach_msg through an x86 trap gate. Samuel
