Small clarification here: > The current toolchains that target GNU/Hurd (Clang and GCC) use > whatever ABI GNU/Linux uses, so that'd be the gp-as-reserved-register > case, I think? If we were to change that, we need to send patches > to GCC and LLVM, changing the default Mach ABI. I think we should > keep the current behaviour as it'd be consistent with the GNU/Linux ABI, > but that is just my opinion.
I only meant for the case of RISC-V. For other architectures, I do not know if GNU/Hurd uses a different ABI than GNU/Linux. Hakan
