On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:08:23AM -0300, Andrés More wrote: > I noted the following issue with 'indent', I could be wrong but I > think it is non-uniform behavior. > When I indent code like [1], the '*' get a different placement if the > item is a typedef. > By the way, [2] does not suffer the same '*' realignment. >
indent(1) reads: You must use the ‘-T’ option to tell indent the name of all the typenames in your program that are defined by typedef. And then you get uniform indentation. I guess this this because typedefs can be defined in separate header files, so indent requires manual definition usind -T option. On the other hand, I cannot image situation when pointer to unknown type should be handled specially. Maybe indent confuses it with arithmetic expression. -- Petr
pgpseFAaelj0k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bug-indent mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-indent
