> Nitpick, that should be HAVE_LIBHISTORY, there is no guarantee that > add_history is part of libreadline. And the check should check for > add_history in libreadline _and_ libhistory.
I am confused. I have /usr/include/readline/history.h and /usr/lib/libhistory.so on my GNU/Linux system, and the former has the prototype for add_history. However Inetutils does not #include <readline/history.h>, nor does any of the files in /usr/include/readline #include "history.h". So where is the prototype for add_history coming from in Inetutls? Should not we refer to history.h and/or -lhistory too as just as we do for readline.h and -lreadline? Secondly, is it possible for add_history to be in libreadline.so instead of libhistory.so on GNU systems? Or in other terms why should we check for add_history in both libreadline _and_ libhistory? Happy hacking, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ bug-inetutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-inetutils
