Jeff Bailey <[email protected]> writes: > These changes seem wrong: > > + * Copyright (c) 1991, 1993, 2009 > * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > > In that the Regents of the University of California haven't got new > copyright, the FSF does.
Oops, my Emacs copyright-update hook bites. What is the proper way to solve this? Shouldn't the files contain a FSF copyright line? And shouldn't future contributions, owned by the FSF, be GPLv3+ rather than BSD licensed? For example, see patch below that just adds a GPLv3 template at the top. > Otherwise the ANSIfication and adding headers seems good to me. Thanks. /Simon --- auth.c.~1.10.~ 2006-10-21 20:08:45.000000000 +0200 +++ auth.c 2009-06-09 07:03:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,20 @@ +/* + Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + + This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or + (at your option) any later version. + + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. +*/ + /*- * Copyright (c) 1991, 1993 * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
