[bug-inetutils] regarding route

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

So I'm reworking route (for the third time since I've always manage to
misplace it).  Question is, should we support the old syntax for
route?  Currently, I'm ignoring that, but before I go about adding it
to inetutils, the easy (and right since it will keep the real version
clean) solution is to have a shell script wrapper that would work like
`the old' route, what do people think?