Mats Andersson <[email protected]> ha escrit: > The updated standard RFC 3659 explicitely mentions 550 as the preferred > reply to SIZE and MDTM, including examples, for the case of non-existing > files. The new document does not mention NLST at all. > > Can we use this as an argument for our present implementation?
Yes, I believe we can. This does not mean, however, that we should drop supporting NLST. > After updating with RFC 2428 (EPRT and EPSV), I intend to update > our FTPD server code to follow RFC 3959. Great. Regards, Sergey
