fredag den 3 oktober 2014 klockan 19:51 skrev Guillem Jover detta: > Hi! > > I just stumbled over this on <http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q4/79>, > and from a cursory glance it appears as if inetutils' syslogd is also > vulnerable? There's a patch there that seems would apply w/o much > effort.
I have begun an analysis, in fact I intended to perform a review already earlier since there seemed to be another obscurity related to facility decoding. Regards, Mats E A
