Hi Yuri, * Pooh wrote on Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 03:38:52PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >>libtool --mode=link CC -rpath /tmp -o libcon2.la dummy.lo libcon.la > >>It becomes: > >>CC -G -hlibcon2.so.0 -o .libs/libcon2.so.0.0.0 .libs/dummy.o -Qoption > >>ld -z -Qoption ld allextract,./.libs/libcon.a -Qoption ld -z -Qoption ld > >>defaultextract -lCstd -lCrun -lc > >>Which is considered wrong, the string must look like: > >>CC -G -hlibcon2.so.0 -o .libs/libcon2.so.0.0.0 .libs/dummy.o -z > >>allextract ./.libs/libcon.a -z defaultextract -lCstd -lCrun -lc > >>As stated here: http://forum.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=27249&tstart=0 > > > >There is a partly related bugfix pending: > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-10/msg00111.html
I forgot to say that above bugfix was C, not C++. > >Does > > CC -G -hlibcon2.so.0 -o .libs/libcon2.so.0.0.0 -z \ > > allextract ./.libs/libcon.a -z defaultextract -lCstd -lCrun -lc > > > >work as well? For which compiler/Solaris versions (print `CC -V')? > >(I assume not, that's probably why you added the dummy.lo in the first > >place, right?) > > > Yes, dummy.lo is about this matter, somewhere someday in my projects it > didn't work... But when i try your line now, it works on CC v5.5 and v5.6. > > >What I haven't understood yet is why we use `-Qoption' at all. There > >must be some combination where `-z' doesn't work as expected. (Haven't > >checked the archives for this yet..) > > > On CC v5.3 if we write > CC ... -z allextract libfoo.a -z defaultextract ..., > It becomes > ld ... -z allextract -z defaultextract.... > While > CC ... -Qoption ld -z,allextract,.libfoo.a -Qoption ld -z,defaultextract > Becomes > ld ... -z allextract libfoo.a -z defaultextract > I wrote about it to bug-libtool in march (about 08.03). For 5.3 it was > ok, but now -Qoption ld seems deprecated, and first approach works on my > 5.5 (patched and not) and 5.6. Thank you for checking. Could I ask another favor? Could you try the same thing for the C compiler driver, and maybe also for the Fortran ones (again including versions and stuff)? Thank you very much. > >By the way, another question (since you seem to have access to a number > >of compiler/system version): Does the addition of `-lCstd -lCrun' cause > >the C++ library symbols to be copied into the created library, or are > >they linked dynamically? *snip* > The answer to your question: on all four platforms it is being linked > dynamically. Great! Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
