[ Cc:ing both lists; let's drop the automake list ] Hello David,
* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST: > > HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64 > automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60 > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06) > For the installed, libtool-created libraries, I am use "-L/some/path" > in foo_LDFLAGS when linking foo, but I seem to need to use both > "-L/some/path" _and_ "-R/some/path" when linking foo with installed > non-libtool-created libraries. Yes, I think this is intended, although I admit that the documentation doesn't reveal this. (Old old convention.) > Libtool is creating a script that wrappers the non-installed foo, and > sets the LD_LIBRARY_PATH accordingly _except_ that there is no > reference to the installed non-libtool-created library paths. Are you speaking about the case with -R/some/path or without? If with, then why does it not work out of the box, i.e., without having to amend LD_LIBRARY_PATH? (I don't deny that there could be a bug; if there is, then we should add a test case to expose it, and fix it.) Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
