Hello, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Rainer,* Rainer Tammer wrote on Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 12:25:03PM CET:I have checked the following libtool versions on several AIX versions: 1. branch-1.5-20080108-cvs on AIX 5.2, 5.3, 6.1 result: AIX 5.2 / branch-1.5 / OK AIX 5.3 / branch-1.5 / OK AIX 6.1 / branch-1.5 / OK 2. HEAD-20080108-cvs on AIX 5.3, 6.1 result: AIX 5.3 / HEAD / testsuite OK, FAIL: tests/mdemo-exec.test (3 times) AIX 6.1 / HEAD / testsuite OK, FAIL: tests/mdemo-exec.test (3 times) The detailed test results are in the attached archive. All test were conducted with IBM C/C++ compilers.And all tests were done with runtimelinking enabled (-brtl). It'd be cool if we could even get things to work smoothly without, but having it working with it is already good.
I think IBM recommends the rtl method... I attach a short paper from IBM to this mail - "linking102". The baseline from this paper is:* build shared modules with -G or "-brtl -bnortllib -bnosymbolic -berok -bM:SRE" (which is the same)
* build the app with -brtl
So we basically have only one bug left with XL/runtimelinking (the mdemo-exec one).If you like me to perforce some tests with gcc then I can try that too..Yes, that would be great. The systems I test on currently don't have g++ or gfortran (or gcj) installed, so if you could test ./configure CC=gcc CXX=g++ FC=gfortran F77=gfortran
I can check gcc/g++. Unfortunately I do not have Fortran installed.Maybe I can try a build test with IBM xlf 5.x (very old version) but this is a bit complicated as I only have very limited access to this machine.
(with LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl added, and maybe even without) that would help a lot. Cheers, and many thanks for your work! Ralf
Bye Rainer
linking102-a4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
