Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> >> Your gcj and automake are broken. Do you have a sane toolchain on any of >> your systems? > > That sounds a little harsh. I think that the LZMA complaint from > automake may be because libtool requests a lzma package and it requires > the very latest automake to do so. Most people won't have the latest > automake. > > Libtool maintainers typically run all of the latest autotools in > relatively pristine environments. With so many tests, we can expect > plenty of breakage in more typical user environments. The test failures > don't mean that libtool won't satisfy the user's actual requirements.
You are right, of course, it was too harsh. I was simply overwhelmed when I looked at the volume of mail on the bug-libtool list. Because of the lzma addition, an automake that is new enough to create lzma dists is required to run the testsuite. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
