On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 09:58:38AM +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >What I instead meant was: the installed libltdl.la file is missing, > >but the libltdl.so.7 file is still present, as is the ltdl.h header > >in the include directory. > > > >Does that still match your setup? > > The problem is that I have installed 2.2 and then the versions patched > as you indicated on the same path. So, even if something that belonged > to 2.1.b was still there when I say 2.2's `make check' failing, now it > has been overwritten.
OK. > >Also, are things working for you with 2.3a now? > > Things work with 2.2 + your patches. However, I am of course willing to test with 2.3a. Where is it? I have looked in There is no release 2.3a. 2.3a is the term for the CVS version, i.e., currently CVS HEAD. There will however be a 2.2.2 in a few weeks. Just to make sure I have understood you right: if with whatever you currently have, you run make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS="-v -d -x -k AC_WITH_LTDL" then this passes for you now? Thanks, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
