I built gcc 3.2.3 and tried that for lilypong 1.8.1. It worked just fine. Actually, I tried 3.3.1 first, which does not work, THEN I tried gcc 3.2.3. At any rate, I'm very happy with the result. Lilypond is fantastic.
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 07:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Didn't 1.6.6 have that silly bug in the font naming so that > > you couldn't get correct PDF files. I don't understand what > > the problem could have been with 1.6.10 (or 1.6.12) but > > I also don't understand, since nothing fundamental changed between the > releases, but the core dump is real. _______________________________________________ Bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
