[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > The chord-naming scheme is consistent with Ignatzek's book. If you > > prefer another system, you're welcome to code support for it. > > > > Han-Wen > > (Getting very tired of yet another chord name request) > > I'm just curious: Does this book say that \chords c^3 and \chords c should be > typeset identically? (in that case i'll just do a dirty workaround in my > music).
c^3 is just a plain fifth. Since that doesn't have a traditional harmonic function, I suppose it doesn't qualify as chord. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
