[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> There's one situation I find curious though. The following scores have
> different music but produce the same paper output:
>
> \score {\notes \relative c'' \partcombine
> {g4 g a( b) c c r r}
> {g4 g r4 r e e g g}}
> \score {\notes \relative c'' \partcombine
> {g4 g a( b) e, e r r}
> {g4 g r4 r c c g g}}
>
> If I would have typeset the second score manually, I would have used polyphony
> notation for the <<e c>> notes, to mark that the c actually belongs to the
> 'lower' part. (<c'' e'> suggests that the upper voice plays the c, while <<e'
> \\ c''>> suggests that the lower voice plays the c)
>
> I.e., I suggest an additional rule saying that polyphony notation should be
> used instead of chord notation if the pitch of the second part is
> higher tha
I've changed this in CVS.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
