On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 19:56, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > your best bet would be the tetex from Fedora core 1, because it is > > > closest related to RH9. > > > > Ok, do I need anything other than the obvious (obvious = tetex-*)? > > no, probably not.
Han-Wen/Jan, Thanks for the help with this. I've installed tetex-2.0.2-8 from Fedora core 1 and it seems to be working with LilyPond 2.3.0 (ChangeLog 1.2066). When the RPMs were being installed I got a few warnings: warning: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf created as /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf.rpmnew /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.ps created as /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.ps.rpmnew Now, I understand enough about this (I think) that this is a safegaurd against overwriting some configuration files. I don't recall having done anything to these config files so is it probably safe to remove the '.rpmnew' and append '.old' on the old files? Am I correct that in the following case the old file has the altered name? warning: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.pdf saved as /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.pdf.rpmsave Thanks, David _______________________________________________ Bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
