Actually, I only hold on to a demo of Sibelius, and an old one at that. I use it to experiment when I'm composing. A student paying a zillion dollars for that? Get real. :)
Since you petitioned, I will release the (unfinished) project to the open. Two reasons why not to keep the volume at maximum whilst listening:
a) The piece itself should tell you why. b) The nasty chords at high volume truly do hurt the ears.
http://spamguy.cwru.edu/misc/music/mvmt2.mid http://spamguy.cwru.edu/misc/mvmt2.pdf
Nasty Chord #1 occurs at m. 49 (41 in the PDF), or 1:35. Nasty Chord #2 occurs at m. 57 (49 in PDF), or 1:51. NC #3 at 65 (57 in PDF) (2:07), and trails for a few measures on one instrument.
Best, Will
On Apr 23, 2005, at 5.03 AM, Bernard Hurley wrote:
I don't know what others on the list think but, personally, I would not be prepared to even look at this unless you _post_ enough information (e.g. a small example) to illustrate the problem. That way everyone knows what the bug is and everyone knows when it has been fixed. I am not altogether happy with the idea of people fixing "secret bugs" on a free software project. (See http://www.gnu.org for definition).
OTOH it is nice to know that you own Sibelius but use Lily for typesetting!
/Bernard
Will Oram wrote:I'm not willing to openly distribute the MIDI/PDF/code of this project (I'm secretive that way :), but anyone who mails me a request can take a look at anything they want.
I have to smile and remember
when you accuse me of that smell
----------------------------------------------------------
_ | WILL ORAM
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | spamguy (at) foxchange . com
- against HTML email X | wro1 (at) cwru . edu
& vCards / \ |
| AIM spamguy21
----------------------------------------------------------
(ABOVE: Magnetic poetry #3)_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
