Thanks Graham :(
OK - here are the results:
2.11.34-1
Compiles in 15 secs
Uses .fontconfig directory
2.11.35-1
Fails with libguile2-17.dll not found
Copied this in, then
Fails with error about ice-9/boot-9.scm not in load
path
2.11.35-2
Compiles in 15 secs, but
Lots of error messages like
Pango CRITICAL
FT_Get_Glyph_Name() error invalid argument
Glyph has no name
Skipping Glyph U+FFFFFFFF ... Century-Schl-Roma.otf
Uses .fontconfig directory
2.11.36-1, 37-1, 41-1, 42-1
All compile slowly - 65 secs
All use .lilypond-fonts directory
Trevor D
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 March 2008 08:26
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Valentin Villenave; Bug-Lilypond
> Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font
> caching problem?
>
>
> You're going to kick yourself over this:
> http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:04:06 -0000
> "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Problem seen in 2.11.41 and 42, not in 2.11.34.
> I didn't install or
> > download any intervening development releases.
> I'd be happy to try
> > them, but how do I get the binaries for Windows?
> >
> > Trevor D
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 13 March 2008 01:36
> > > To: Valentin Villenave
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bug-Lilypond
> > > Subject: Re: Slow compile on Windows XP - font
> > > caching problem?
> > >
> > >
> > > this type of stuff is tricky. The last time we
> > > saw this, it was
> > >
> > > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf/");
> > > - dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir +
> "/fonts/type1/");
> > > + /* Extra trailing slash suddenly breaks
> > > fontconfig (fc-cache 2.5.0)
> > > + on windows. */
> > > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/otf");
> > > + dirs.push_back (lilypond_datadir + "/fonts/type1");
> > >
> > > can someone please post the exact version number
> > > where you've started
> > > seeing this?
> > >
> > > 2008/3/11, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > 2008/3/11, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, definitely a regression. I've gone
> > > back to using
> > > > > 2.11.34 which does not suffer this bug, as
> > > most of my
> > > > > documentation work is fiddling with tiny
> > > snippets, and a 1
> > > > > minute delay every time I make a change
> > > makes it impossible
> > > > > to work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > OK. That's it. I've opened a new issue:
> > > >
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=588
> > >
> > > Trevor: perhaps you should try the workaround
> > described on
> > >
> >
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=545#c1
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Valentin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > bug-lilypond mailing list
> > > bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> > http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
