2008/10/29 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't see anything that's non-synchronized here and I don't really agree > on the > title of the bug report. What the example shows is simply a use of > simultaneous > and sequential combinations of contexts.
Yes, this is what I mean by non-synchronized (i.e. there is no top-level << >> construct). I've changed the issue title. Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
