On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 1/29/09 1:58 PM, "Patrick McCarty" <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On second thought, that might not be a good idea. It would probably > > be best to leave the grob definition in scm/define-grobs.scm and just > > revise the documentation. This would leave SeparationItem overrides > > in their current state: "silently ignored". > > Seems to me like we should remove the SeparationItem grob if there's no way > to create one. And we need a convert-ly rule to eliminate any > SeparationItem overrides. Let's clean it up properly, instead of leaving > detritus around.
Agreed, and 2.13 will start in a matter of days. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
